Friday, February 21, 2020

Ethics in Digital Content Sharing Research Paper

Ethics in Digital Content Sharing - Research Paper Example The PIPA works the same as the SOPA; with its main function also being the blocking, the sites that sell copyright materials. The stop online piracy act and the Protect IP Act have however not been amended yet. The two bills gave rise to a new procedure to take down the sites; the site is only those that violate the laws The creative commons, on the other hand, is a nonprofit organization whose main aim is to enable the use and the sharing of knowledge and creativity through free legal tools. The creative commons offer copyright licenses that are easy to use; these licenses provide a standardized and a simple way to give the public the permission to share and use creative works. The licenses let one to change the default copyright terms easily to some rights reserved, this license enables one to modify the copyrights terms to the best desired terms. The creative terms aimed at realizing the potential of the internet fully giving a new era of growth development and productivity The SOPA and the PIPA faces many critiques with many opponents proposing the stoppage of the two, the main question to ask however before criticizing the bills is "is copyright infringement right? Doesnt it violate the ethics, the privacy, and the security of the digital content?" Looking at the aims of the bills, the two of them are important as they protect copyright infringement. The SOPA is more functional as it goes, as it requires the operators to show the sites that steal the U.S media properties (Schmitz, p.220) Since the infringement of copyrights is illegal in many of the states, then the bill are important. It is, however, beneficial to understand that piracy and the copyright infringement leads to job losses; this is because it deprives content creators of profits. The legislation of the two bills will revamp a broken system that does not prevent criminal behavior. The bills face, however, face a lot of critics

Wednesday, February 5, 2020

Current Macroeconomic Situation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Current Macroeconomic Situation - Essay Example The argument that one takes only meat and no pasta or read is for one to be likely to lose weight (Pollan, 2007). I think the argument is that the pasta and bread only add up to carbohydrates. The Atkins diet suggest eating meat only and no bread, I think there are many other risks associated with a lot of protein. Dr Robert C. Atkins may have invented the Atkins diet, but I must question how it happens; that people still prefer taking sliming pills or other fad diets. Though this may be the best diet, it does not make sense because; people need energy as source of energy boosters (Pollan, 2007). Fat and sugar and sources of energy, but the Atkins diet fails to recommend them. Perhaps the argument fails to consider the fact that carbohydrates are not the main cause of weight gain (Pollan, M. Chevat, 2009). There are many types of foods that people think contribute to the overweight, this feeling is true but it is just how much and how often one takes them. For example, fast foods con tribute significantly to overweight especially if one consumes them more often and on a daily basis. On the other hand, irregular consumption of fast foods do not have much effect on the body as fast as weight gain is concerned, it is important to consider consuming recommended quantity of such foods (Pollan, 2007). Based on the above argument, it is healthy to argue that the omnivores argument is wrong as not all foods contraindicated by the omnivores are bad. In fact, all those foods have well for health and they contribute to a healthy you. It is also imperative to note that the countries that the omnivores are believed to have a positive diet have overweight people, and if the omnivores thinks slimmer is healthy, I am a little confused because that is not what healthy means (Pollan, M. Chevat, 2009). Having read Rousseau’s, a lot seems to be misplaced because the information does not add u at all. For example, most of the works are borrowed from other texts and this does make Rousseau an expert. Additionally, his argument is not sounding like those of an expert. Rousseau, introduces the consumption of mushroom and does not come clean where mushroom fits in (Pollan, 2007). Firstly, mushroom is a vegetable that is relatively harmless but harmful if the wrong specie is taken. The fact that most of the text in these books does not make them authors because nothing in these books are original content but other people works. This only makes their work vague. There is also the feeling that their work is mainly commercial because there is a lot of reference to the availability of the foods in supermarkets (Atkins, 2002). This may be marketing gimmick. There are many mistakes in ignorance, for example, people tend to each whatever they come across without knowing the consequences of their diets and this may not be easy to change considering that, they are ignorant. People will easily eat what they want as long as they can afford these foods. It is just ingra ined in the mind of people to eat what they desire and this may not be easy to change (Pollan, 2007). As the supermarket is commercial entities, they are much into business and are focused on profitability. Most supermarket are only sell the products brought by their suppliers are may not be interested in knowing how their foods contribute to the health of their customers Westman, C et al. (2010). Therefore, it is the duty of the customers to